The Tribal Digital Divide: Extent and Explanations - Center for Indian Country Development

Click to access The Tribal Digital Divide: Extent and Explanations

Click to access The Tribal Digital Divide: Extent and Explanations

“This paper documents home Internet access, types of Internet access, connection speeds, and prices for basic home Internet in tribal areas of he United States. We find that the share of households with Internet access is 21 percentage points lower in tribal areas than in neighboring non-tribal areas. When compared to these non-tribal areas, download speeds, whether measured using fixed or mobile broadband networks, are approximately 75 percent slower in tribal areas, while the lowest price for basic Internet services in tribal areas is 11 percent higher.

Regression techniques reveal that traditional cost factors such as terrain and population density fully explain the price gap but account for only a fraction of the tribal differences in Internet access and connection speeds. Income differences are strong predictors of Internet access but do not affect connection speeds. A sizable amount of the variation in the access and home connection gap between tribal and non-tribal is left unexplained. We conclude with a discussion of how federal broadband programs have penetrated Indian Country, how tribal-specific factors are related to the variation in Internet access within Indian Country, and the potential policy implications of our findings.”

Revised June 27, 2022

This working paper can be used by Tribal/Native leaders to understand gaps in internet access and utilize this research to advocate for their communities.

Highlights:

  • We document home Internet access, types of Internet access, connection speeds, and prices for basic home Internet in tribal areas of the United States.

  • Share of households with Internet access is 21 percentage points lower in tribal areas than in neighboring non-tribal areas.

  • This access gap between tribal and non-tribal areas is approximately three times larger than the White-Black access gap and four times larger than the urban-rural access gap.

  • Observed costs do not explain the variation in access and connection speeds between tribal and non-tribal areas.

 
Previous
Previous

Legal Issues in Tribal E-Commerce - American University Business Law Review

Next
Next

California’s Initiative to Improve Broadband Impact on Tribes and Underserved Communities: Middle-Mile Broadband Initiative